Environmental Matters Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 81 - 90 of 101
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al v. Jane Cottrell, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-35756
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL
Defendant - Appellee: JANE L. COTTRELL, in her official capacity as acting Regional Forester and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
McFarland White Ranch v. Ed Schafer, et al
as 09-35579
Plaintiff - Appellant: MCFARLAND WHITE RANCH
Defendant - Appellee: ED SCHAFER, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, GAIL KIMBELL, in her capacity as Chief, U.S. Forest Service and others
SEACC, et al v. Federal Highway Administration, et al
as 09-35555
Plaintiff - Appellee: SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL, SKAGWAY MARINE ACCESS COMMISSION, LYNN CANAL CONSERVATION, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RAY LAHOOD, in his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation and others
Defendant-intervenor: STATE OF ALASKA
SEACC, et al v. State of Alaska, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-35551
Plaintiff - Appellee: SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL, SKAGWAY MARINE ACCESS COMMISSION, LYNN CANAL CONSERVATION, INC. and others
Defendant: FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RAY LAHOOD, in his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA
Native Ecosystems Council, et al v. Tom Tidwell, et al
as 09-35544
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL and ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant - Appellee: TOM TIDWELL, Regional Forester of Region One of the United States Forest Service and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Tongass Conservation Society, et al v. Forrest Cole, et al
as 09-35451
Plaintiff - Appellant: TONGASS CONSERVATION SOCIETY, SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Defendant - Appellee: FORREST COLE, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Tongass National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Friends of the Columbia Gorge,, et al v. Eric Schafer, et al
as 09-35414
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC., COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER, 1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON, COLUMBIA GORGE HOTEL CO. and others
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC SCHAFER, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and LINDA GOODMAN, Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service
J. Scott v. USA, et al
as 09-35222
Plaintiff - Appellant: J. B. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Amicus Curiae: BLUERIBBON COALITION
League of Wilderness Defenders, et al v. John Allen, et al
as 09-35125
Plaintiff - Appellee: LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS-BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, CASCADIA WILDLANDS PROJECT and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant: JOHN P. ALLEN, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the Deschutes National Forest and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an administrative agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant: INTERFOR PACIFIC, INC. and AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
Citizens for Better Forestry, et al v. United States Department of Ag, et al
as 09-15255
Plaintiff - Appellee: CITIZENS FOR BETTER FORESTRY, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and U.S.D.A. FOREST SERVICE
Defendant-intervenor: AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?