Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Evanston Insurance Company, et al v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insu, et al
as 12-35783
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company and AMERICAN GUARANTEE & LIABILITY INSURANCE CO., a foreign insurance company
Defendant:
WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, also known as Royal Insurance Company, NORTHWEST TOWER CRANE SERVICE INC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, individually and as asuccessor to Royal Insurance Company of America aka Royal Insurance Company
Michael Peterson v. Time Insurance Company, et al
as 12-35505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL PETERSON, individually, and as the personal representative for the estate of Joshua Peterson
Defendant - Appellee:
TIME INSURANCE COMPANY, ASSURANT HEALTH, JOHN ALDEN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Michael Edson v. Liberty Mutual Holding Company, et al
as 12-15707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDSON, a single man
Defendant - Appellee:
LIBERTY MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY, INC., a Massachusetts mutual holding company, LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, INC., a Massachusetts company, FIRST LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, a foreign corporation and others
Treasury Solutions Holdings, I, et al v. Upromise, Inc., et al
as 12-15239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TREASURY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, INC., a Georgia corporation, TREASURY SOLUTIONS, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, FKA GIF Plan Advisors, LLC and GIF SERVICES, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
UPROMISE, INC., a Delaware corporation, UPROMISE INVESTMENTS, INC., a Delaware corporation and THE VANDGUARD GROUP, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, 1 through 10, individuals, ABLE-BAKER COMPANY, 1-10, partnerships and BLACK & WHITE, INC., 1-10, corporations
Sarah West, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 11-35701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARAH WEST, AUSRA WEST and JAMES WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN DOES A, B, AND C
Evanston Insurance Company, et al v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insu, et al
as 10-36133
Plaintiff:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN GUARANTEE & LIABILITY INSURANCE CO., a foreign insurance company
Defendant - Appellee:
WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, also known as Royal Insurance Company, ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, individually and as asuccessor to Royal Insurance Company of America aka Royal Insurance Company and others
John Doe I, et al v. Nestle, USA, et al
as 10-56739
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE I, individually and on behalf of proposed class members, JOHN DOE II, individually and on behalf of proposed class members, JOHN DOE III, individually and on behalf of proposed class members and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NESTLE, S.A., NESTLE USA, INC., NESTLE IVORY COAST and others
Philip Pulver, et al v. Battelle Memorial Institute, et al
as 10-35906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP PULVER and CATALOGS ONLINE, INC, a Washington Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE, a non-profit corporation, DBA Pacific Northwest Laboratory, DBA Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and JOHN DOES, 1 through XX
Amy Schorno v. State Farm Fire and Casualty C, et al
as 10-35772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMY CATHERINE SCHORNO
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, a foreign corporation and JOHN DOES, 1-10
Andrea Marks v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 10-16601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREA MARKS, a single woman
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a foreign corporation, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a Federally Chartered Corporation, DBA Fannie Mae, BLACK CORPORATIONS, 1-5 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
