Cases 1 - 10 of 11
R. Kulick v. Beverly Vandermeulen, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 22-55751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. J. KULICK
Defendant / Appellee:
BEVERLY VANDERMEULEN, ROBERT BUELING, RICHARD LOOMIS and others
Susan Baker, et al v. Dean Meiling, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 22-15503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN BAKER, an individual, BUEL BARNETT, an individual, BRUCE BOSTON, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN MEILING, an individual, MADYLON MEILING, an individual, CHEMEON SURFACE TECHNOLOGY LLC, a Nevada limited Liability Company and others
Defendant:
JANET CHUBB, an individual, MEILING FAMILY PARTNERS, LTD., ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP, a Missouri Limited Liability Partnership and others
Billon, Inc. v. James Slatin, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 17-56790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLON, INC., DBA Omega Products International
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES SLATIN, EDNA CORLEY, JOHN VINZANT and others
Zurich American Insurance Comp v. Sealink Insurance Service Corp, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 17-55776
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
SEALINK INSURANCE SERVICE CORP. and YAN SARA ZHANG
Defendant:
PHANN GELINDA KEO, LEANG K. LIM and DOES, 1-100, inclusive
People of the State of CA, et al v. Brad Culpepper, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-56639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel TIG Insurance Company and TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, as Successor by Merger to Fairmont Premier Insurance Company
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD CULPEPPER and DOES, 1-100, inclusive
People of the State of CA, et al v. Brad Culpepper, et al
as 16-56639
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel TIG Insurance Company and TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, as Successor by Merger to Fairmont Premier Insurance Company
Defendant / Appellee:
BRAD CULPEPPER and DOES, 1-100, inclusive
Marcus Yano v. Government Employees Insurance, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-17479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS YANO
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES 1 - 100, inclusive, and each of them
Gisele Rogers v. Epson America, Inc., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-57016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GISELE ROGERS, individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
EPSON AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, EPSON ACCESSORIES, INC., a California corporation, SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation and others
Firemans Fund Insurance Compan, et al v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co, et al
as 10-35908
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FIREMANS FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a California company and NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, an Illinois company
Defendant - Appellant:
OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Oregon company and NORTH PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, an Oregon company; Does 1-100 inclusive & does 101-200 inclusive
Firemans Fund Insurance Compan, et al v. North Pacific Insurance Compan, et al
as 10-35814
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FIREMANS FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a California company and NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, an Illinois company
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, an Oregon company; Does 1-100 inclusive & does 101-200 inclusive and OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Oregon company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.