Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cecelia Cook-Brunn, et al v. Duane Brunn, et al
as 17-35543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECELIA COOK-BRUNN and OSAGE MINING CO.
Defendant - Appellee:
DUANE EDWARD BRUNN, R. A. LONG RUN, LLC, DOLLAR TYME, LLC and others
Northland Casualty Company v. Northwest Log Homes, LLC, et al
as 16-35731
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NORTHLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
NORTHWEST LOG HOMES, LLC and DUANE KEIM
Defendant-cross-claim-3rd-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH S. MULROY, DBA Yorlum Ranch, DBA Yorlum Ranch, Ltd.
Third-party-defendant:
GLACIER INSURANCE OF LIBBY, INC., a Montana corporation
Oregon Realty Company v. Greenwich Insurance Company, et al
as 13-35127
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OREGON REALTY COMPANY
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
GREENWICH INSURANCE COMPANY
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
SHARON BANKOFIER and DUANE BANKOFIER
Duane Bauley, et al v. Metlife Home Loans, et al
as 12-35493
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DUANE BAULEY and APRIL BAULEY
Defendant - Appellant:
METLIFE HOME LOANS, a division of MetLife Bank, NA, a New Jersey headquartered National Bank and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY and WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
The Scotts Company LLC v. Dye Seed Ranch, Inc., et al
as 11-35234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE SCOTTS COMPANY LLC, an Ohio limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
DYE SEED RANCH, INC., a Washington corporation, MAPLE LEAF FARM, INC., a Washington corporation, MICA CREEK, INC., a Washington corporation and others
Citizens for Constitutional Fa, et al v. Jackson County, et al
as 10-36029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., DUANE CROSS and others
Plaintiff:
VELDA DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon and DANNY JORDAN
Citizens for Constitutional Fa, et al v. Rogue Advocates, et al
as 09-35669
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., DUANE CROSS and others
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon and DANNY JORDAN
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant:
ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Citizens for Constitutional Fa, et al v. Jackson County, et al
as 09-35653
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., DUANE CROSS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon
Defendant:
DANNY JORDAN
Defendant-intervenor:
ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Amicus Curiae:
ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
Citizens for Constitutional Fa, et al v. Jackson County, et al
as 09-35653
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., DUANE CROSS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon
Defendant:
DANNY JORDAN
Not Yet Classified:
ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON
Amicus Curiae:
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION
Cross, et al v. Jackson County, et al
as 08-36069
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., CARL OFFENBACHER and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUANE CROSS, BUD KAUFMAN, GARY WIRTH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon and DANNY JORDAN
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
Third-party-defendant:
STATE OF OREGON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
