Contract Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Michael Watkins, et al v. William Westin, et al
as 23-16171
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL W. WATKINS and MARYANN WATKINS
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM WESTIN, in his official capacity as Chief of lnspection Services Section (ISS) of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and in his personal capacity, EDWARD MILAM, in his official capacity as Central Region Supervisor of ISS of CDCR and in his personal capacity, JOE BANUELOS, in his official capacity as Inspector ISS of CDCR and in his personal capacity and others
Rosa A. Camacho, et al v. NMI Settlement Fund, et al
as 23-16074
Plaintiff: BETTY JOHNSON, on behalf of herself and as a representative of a class of similarly situated persons
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROSA A. CAMACHO, Retiree and Member of the Settlement Class
Defendant: RALPH DLG. TORRES, Governor of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
Defendant / Appellee: NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS RETIREMENT FUND and NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS SETTLEMENT FUND
Preferred Contractors Insurance Company, RRG, LLC v. Baker and Son Construction, Inc., et al
as 23-35371
Plaintiff / Appellant: PREFERRED CONTRACTORS INSURANCE COMPANY RISK RETENTION GROUP LLC
Defendant / Appellee: BAKER AND SON CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Washington for profit corporation and ANGELA COX, as Personal Representative of The Estate of Ronnie E. Cox, Deceased; individually and as a Mother of G.C., a minor
Type: Contract Insurance
Beth Bowen v. Energizer Holdings, Inc., et al
as 23-55116
Plaintiff / Appellant: BETH BOWEN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee: ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC., EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE COMPANY, EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE BRANDS, LLC and others
James Falls v. Soulbound Studios, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-35863
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES FALLS, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: SOULBOUND STUDIOS, LLC
Defendant: SOULBOUND STUDIOS USA, XSOLLA USA, INC. and DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
David Clark, et al v. SILAC Insurance Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-35685
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID CLARK, as guardians and conservators for James W. Carroll and Dorothy M. Carroll, DELLA CLARK, as guardians and conservators for James W. Carroll and Dorothy M. Carroll, DAVID CLARK, as guardian and conservator for James W. Carroll and personal representative of the estate of Dorothy M. Carroll and others
Defendant / Appellee: SILAC INSURANCE COMPANY, FDBA Equitable Life & Casualty Insurance Company and JOHN DOES, 1-20
Type: Contract Insurance
Commerce West Insurance Company v. George Allen, et al
as 22-35296
Plaintiff / Appellee: COMMERCE WEST INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellant: GEORGE ALLEN, an individual in his personal capacity
Defendant: MARY ROE, an individual
Type: Contract Insurance
Banner Life Insurance Company v. Talese Anderson, et al
as 22-35082
Plaintiff / Appellee: BANNER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellant: TALESE L. ANDERSON, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: JORDAN M. EGGERS, individually and in his capacity as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Jeremy C. Eggers
Type: Contract Insurance
Melissa Strafford, et al v. Eli Lilly and Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-56064
Plaintiff - Appellant: MELISSA STRAFFORD, CAROL JACQUEZ and DAVID MATTHEWS, Jr., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, an Indiana corporation
Megan Stone, et al v. GEICO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-35502
Plaintiff - Appellant: MEGAN STONE and CHRISTINE CAROSI, individually and as the representatives of all persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE CO.
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?