Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Ron Newt v. Lee Daniels, et al
as 16-56253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RON NEWT, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE DANIELS, an individual, TERENCE HOWARD, an individual, DANNY STRONG, an individual and others
Everette Silas, et al v. Home Box Office, Inc, et al
as 16-56215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERETTE SILAS and SHERRI LITTLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
HOME BOX OFFICE, INC, STEPHEN LEVINSON, MARK WAHLBERG and others
Kaloud, Inc. v. Shisha Land Wholesale, Inc., et al
as 16-56138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KALOUD, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
SHISHA LAND WHOLESALE, INC., a California corporation and DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Almut Reinicke v. Creative Empire LLC, et al
as 14-56467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALMUT REINICKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CREATIVE EMPIRE LLC, a Michigan limited liability company, DBA Mangolanguages.com and DOES, 1-10, inclusive
M Seven System Limited v. Leap Wireless International, I, et al
as 14-56037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M SEVEN SYSTEM LIMITED, a Korean limited liability company
Defendant:
LEAP WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation and CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTSCOM USA, INC., a California corporation, CHRIS YOUNG CHOI, an individual, STANLEY PARK, an individual and others
Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe
as 12-56939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOES, 1-10
Art of Living Foundation v. Doe/Skywalker, et al
as 12-16276
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ART OF LIVING FOUNDATION, a California corporation
Defendant:
DOES, 1-10 and DOE/KLIM
Defendant - Appellant:
DOE/SKYWALKER
Verizon California Inc., et al v. OnLineNic Inc, et al
as 09-16974
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC., VERIZON TRADEMARK SERVICES LLC and VERIZON LICENSING COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
ONLINENIC INC and DOES 1-10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
