Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bungie, Inc. v. Aimjunkies.com, et al
as 23-35468
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BUNGIE, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
AIMJUNKIES.COM, a business of unknown classification, PHOENIX DIGITAL GROUP LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, JEFFREY CONWAY, an individual and others
Tamara Wareka v. Trusper, Inc., et al
as 23-15930
Appellant:
TAMARA WAREKA, PKA Tamara Williams
Defendant:
TRUSPER, INC., DBA Musely
3Rd Party Defendant:
HML & CO. LLC, DBA Mai Couture
Tamara Wareka v. Trusper, Inc., et al
as 23-15838
Appellant:
TAMARA WAREKA, PKA Tamara Williams
Defendant:
TRUSPER, INC., DBA Musely
3Rd Party Defendant:
HML & CO. LLC, DBA Mai Couture
Unimundo Corporation v. Garth Humbert, et al
as 11-56569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNIMUNDO CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
GARTH HUMBERT, an Individual and ENLINE, INC., a California Corporation, DBA MAY
Emil Cadkin, et al v. Irma Loose, et al
as 08-56152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMIL CADKIN, An individual and as Trustee of the Cadkin Trust and LILA CADKIN, as Trustee of the Cadkin Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
IRMA LOOSE, an individual, MAY-LOO MUSIC INC., a California corporation and TERENCE LOOSE, As an individual and as Trustee of the WILLIAM LOOSE FAMILY TRUST
Cadkin, et al v. Loose, et al
as 08-55311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMIL CADKIN, an individual and LILA CADKIN, as Trustees of the CADKIN TRUST
Defendant - Appellee:
IRMA LOOSE, an individual, MAY-LOO MUSIC INC., a California corporation and TERENCE LOOSE, as trustee of the William Loose Family Trust
Richlin, et al v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, et al
as 06-55307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY RICHLIN, LANCE RICHLIN, MARK MANNIS and others
Appellant:
LOUISE RICHLIN, ELYSSA PARTON and MICHELLE FORKEL, nominal defendants and involuntary plaintiffs
Defendant - Appellee:
METRO-GOLDWYN-MAY PICTURES, INC. and GEOFFREY PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
