Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Andre Hoskins v. United States Government, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-35880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE HOSKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, JOHN F. KERRY, Secretary of State, in the capacity of his person and others
Naruto v. David Slater, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-15469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NARUTO, a Crested Macaque, by and through his Next Friends, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and ANTJE ENGELHARDT, Ph.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID JOHN SLATER, BLURB, INC., a Delaware corporation and WILDLIFE PERSONALITIES, LTD., a United Kingdom private limited company
Amicus Curiae:
AGUSTIN FUENTES, Primatalogist, Macaque expert, and Professor of Anthropology
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE
Jeff MacSwan, et al v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al
as 13-17138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFF MACSWAN and KELLIE ROLSTAD
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, MARI KOERNER, Dean/a married person and MEREDITH TOTH, a married person
Laura Larson v. Warner Bros Entertainment, Inc, et al
as 13-56257
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
LAURA SIEGEL LARSON, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joanne Siegel, AKA Joanne Siegel
Defendant - Appellant:
WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
DC COMICS, a New York General Partnership
Laura Larson v. Time Warner, Inc., et al
as 13-56259
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
LAURA SIEGEL LARSON, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joanne Siegel, AKA Joanne Siegel
Defendant - Appellant:
TIME WARNER, INC., a corporation, WARNER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a corporation, WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
DC COMICS, a general partnership
Laura Larson v. Time Warner, Inc., et al
as 13-56244
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
LAURA SIEGEL LARSON, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joanne Siegel, AKA Joanne Siegel
Defendant - Appellee:
TIME WARNER, INC., a corporation, WARNER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a corporation, WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
DC COMICS, a general partnership
Laura Larson v. Warner Bros Entertainment, Inc, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-56243
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
LAURA SIEGEL LARSON, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joanne Siegel, AKA Joanne Siegel
Defendant - Appellee:
WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
DC COMICS, a New York General Partnership
DC Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corporation, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-57245
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DC COMICS
Defendant - Appellant:
PACIFIC PICTURES CORPORATION, IP WORLDWIDE, LLC, IPW, LLC and others
DC Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corporation, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-56934
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DC COMICS
Defendant - Appellant:
PACIFIC PICTURES CORPORATION, IP WORLDWIDE, LLC, IPW, LLC and others
Laura Larson v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, et al
as 11-56034
Plaintiff-counter-claim-defendant - Appellee:
LAURA SIEGEL LARSON, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joanne Siegel
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a corporation and DC COMICS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.