Cases 91 - 95 of 95
Jose Jimenez, et al v. Sears, Roebuck And Co., et al
as 10-80053
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JOSE JIMENEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and ELADIO ACOSTA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., a New York corporation
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Lynda Cartwright, et al v. Viking Industries, Inc., et al
as 09-80178
Plaintiff - Respondent:
LYNDA CARTWRIGHT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and LLOYD CARTWRIGHT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
VIKING INDUSTRIES, INC., an Oregon corporation and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, inclusive
Richard Silber v. Shop-Vac Corporation, et al
as 09-55355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. SILBER, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SHOP-VAC CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation and JOHN DOES, 1 through 100 inclusive
Gelasio Salazar v. Avis Budget Group, Inc., et al
as 08-80198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GELASIO SALAZAR, individually, and on behalf of all other similarily situated current and former employees of Defendants in the State of CA and SAAD SHAMMAS, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated current and former employees of Defendants in the State of CA
Defendant - Appellee:
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC., a Delaware Corporation, CENDANT CAR RENTAL OPERATIONS SUPPORT, INC., a Delaware Corporation, BUDGET RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC., a Delaware Corporation and others
Angeline Balsitis, et al v. USDC-CAC
as 08-72000
:
In re: ANGELINE BALSITIS and DEBBIE BALSITIS
Petitioner:
ANGELINE BALSITIS and DEBBIE BALSITIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ORANGE COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY, SOCIAL WORKER ALCALEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
