Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 91 - 100 of 97,546
Aberha v. Garland
as 24-3126
Petitioner: ASHENAFI GEBRE ABERHA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Lopez-Orduno
as 24-3135
Defendant: MARCOS LOPEZ-ORDUNO and Marco Antonio Lopez-Orduno
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Deuschel v. California Health and Human Services Agency, et al.
as 24-3129
Plaintiff: MICHAEL DEUSCHEL
Defendant: CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY and MARK GHALY
D.M. v. Oregon School Activities Association
as 24-3143
Plaintiff: D.M.
Defendant: OREGON SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATION, an Oregon Corporation, by and through the Board of Directors of Oregon School Activities Ass'n
Jimenez Montoya v. Garland
as 24-3132
Petitioner: CARLOS JAVIER JIMENEZ MONTOYA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zawacky, et al. v. Boyle, et al.
as 24-3142
Plaintiff: SUSAN ZAWACKY, Personal Representative of the estate of Jenoah Donald, ALEXZANDRA GASAWAY, guardian of minor I.D., TIFFANY WALLWAY, guardian of minor S.W. and others
Defendant: SEAN BOYLE, Sheriff's Deputy, COUNTY OF CLARK, a political subdivision of the State of Washington and HOLLY DEZUBIRIA
State of Alaska, et al. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al.
as 24-3148
Plaintiff: STATE OF ALASKA and NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH
Defendant: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Intervenor: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Pierson-Haupt v. Wrigley, et al.
as 24-3146
Petitioner: TYLER MATTHEW PIERSON-HAUPT, Named as Tyler Mathew Pierson-Haupt
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY, Named as Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Ross v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-3147
Petitioner: RONALD ROSS
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and RONALD OLIVER
Singh v. Warden
as 24-3136
Petitioner: PARDEEP SINGH
Respondent: WARDEN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?