Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 121 - 130 of 97,546
Iliya v. County of Sacramento, et al.
as 24-3122
Plaintiff: DAUDA ILIYA
Defendant: COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a Municipal Corporation, ANNE MARIE SCHUBERT, in her official Capacity as the District Attorney for Sacramento County, SCOTT R. JONES, in his official capacity as the Sheriff for Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and others
Rodriguez Dominguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3113
Petitioner: MARICELA ELIZABETH RODRIGUEZ DOMINGUEZ, KIMBERLY MICHELLE MORAN RODRIGUEZ and CHRISS ENRIQUE MORAN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bennett v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-3119
Petitioner: DAVID BENNETT
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party: MONROE DETENTION CENTER, YOLO COUNTY JAIL, WELL PATH DIRECTOR and others
Nieves-Garcia v. Garland
as 24-3120
Petitioner: JOSE ALFREDO NIEVES-GARCIA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hall v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, et al.
as 24-3100
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, GO2BANK, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Melchor Reyes v. Garland
as 24-3111
Petitioner: ARMANDO MISAEL MELCHOR REYES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Murillo-Ramos v. Garland
as 24-3109
Petitioner: MIGUEL MURILLO-RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Garcia Guillen v. Garland
as 24-3117
Petitioner: HENRY ADRIAN GARCIA GUILLEN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dominguez v. Garland
as 24-3121
Petitioner: ROSA AMALIA DOMINGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lawless v. United States of America
as 24-3075
Plaintiff: RICHARD R. LAWLESS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?