Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Maine State Retirement System, et al v. Countrywide Financial Corp., et al
as 14-55093
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MAINE STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and On Behalf of All Ohters Similarly Situated, DAVID H. LUTHER and WESTERN CONFERENCE OF TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND
Objector - Appellant:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK & TRUST OF ROCHELLE AND LL FUNDS, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., CWALT, INC. and others
American Fidelity Assurance Co v. Countrywide Financial Corporat, et al
as 14-55002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC., COUNTRYWIDE CAPITAL MARKETS LLC and others
Federal Deposit Insurance Com v. Countrywide Securities Corpora, et al
as 13-56783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE COMPANY, as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE SECURITIES CORPORATION, CWALT, INC., CWMBS, INC. and others
FDIC v. Countrywide Securities Corpora, et al
as 13-56675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Guaranty Bank
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE SECURITIES CORPORATION, CWALT, INC., COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
FDIC v. Countrywide Financial Corporat, et al
as 13-56613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver on behalf of Security Savings Bank
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE SECURITIES CORPORATION, CWALT, INC. and others
Carla Visendi, et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 12-80231
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CARLA VISENDI and 159 OTHER NAMED INDIVIDUALS
Defendant - Petitioner:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
FDIC v. Countrywide Financial Corp., et al
as 12-57299
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE SECURITIES CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, CWALT, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Strategic Capital Bank
Amicus Curiae:
THE SECURITIES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION and FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION
FDIC v. Countrywide Financial Corporat, et al
as 12-57299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Strategic Capital Bank
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE SECURITIES CORPORATION, CWALT, INC. and others
Countrywide Financial Corp., et al v. USDC-CALA
as 12-73549
Not Classified By Court:
In re: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Petitioner:
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation doing business in the State of California, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC, a New York corporation and BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation doing business in the State of California
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Countrywide Financial Corp., et al v. USDC-CALA
as 12-73549
:
In re: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. and BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Petitioner:
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation doing business in the State of California, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., a New York corporation and BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation doing business in the State of California
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
DOMINIQUE WHITAKER, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated, the general public and as an "aggrieved employee" under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act and JOHN WHITE, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, the general public and as an "aggrieved employee" under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
