Cases 11 - 20 of 1,739
Woodhouse v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3070
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Havensight Capital L.L.C., A U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE, Acting as a Government Official, a California citizen, R. GARY KLAUSNER, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3053
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FAYE CHESS, ANN DAVIDSON, ADAM EISENBERG and others
Martinez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-2966
Petitioner:
DANIEL SOLOMAN MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Zavala
as 24-2982
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JUAN DANIEL ZAVALA
Alexander v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2942
Plaintiff:
ANAND JON ALEXANDER
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, DANIEL PARAMO, former Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and others
Burmeister v. Peterson, et al.
as 24-2782
Plaintiff:
JEANNETTE BURMEISTER
Defendant:
DANIEL L. PETERSON, M.D., SIERRA INTERNAL MEDICINE and SIMMARON RESEARCH
Hernandez-De Cornejo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2731
Petitioner:
GLADIS ESPERANZA HERNANDEZ-DE CORNEJO, EMELY PAOLA CORNEJO-HERNANDEZ and LIAN DANIEL CORNEJO-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Welch v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2635
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAM GITTERE, WILLIAM RUEBART, DAVID DRUMMOND and others
Edington v. Arizona Governor's Council on Human Trafficking, et al.
as 24-2563
Petitioner:
DANIEL C. EDINGTON
Respondent:
ARIZONA GOVERNOR'S COUNCIL ON HUMAN TRAFFICKING, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, FBI Director, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
