Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 230
Joseph v. Hill, et al.
as 23-3133
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES JOSEPH
Respondent / Appellee: RICK HILL
Respondent: PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA
Grissom v. Hill
as 23-2281
Petitioner: JOHN L. GRISSOM, JR.
Respondent: RICK HILL
FTC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 23-15992
Plaintiff / Appellant: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee: MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Amicus Curiae: LAW PROFESSORS, FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, JAHNA LINDERMUTH, DOUG PETERSON, HERBERT H. SLATERY III, and JOHN SUTHERS, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
Dunn v. Hill
as 23-1322
Petitioner: EMANUEL DUNN, JR.
Respondent: RICK HILL
United States of America v. Myers
as 23-1034
Defendant / Appellant: RONALD BRUCE MYERS, Rick LNU and Rick Curtis
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nunez v. Hill
as 22-1539
Petitioner: IVAN MARK NUNEZ
Respondent: RICK HILL, WARDEN
Felipe Gomez v. Larry Weisenthal, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-55833
Plaintiff / Appellant: FELIPE NERY GOMEZ, personally, and as Former non-attorney Custodian for Arthur Gomez
Defendant / Appellee: LARRY WEISENTHAL, CONNIE WEISENTHAL, as former Trustee and personally, RICK FENELLI, Atty No. 68879 and others
Boykin v. Hill
as 22-993
Petitioner: RAYMOND BOYKIN
Respondent: RICK HILL, WARDEN
USA v. Rick Morales, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-30053
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RICK JOHN MORALES, Jr.
Hung Dang v. Kimberly Moore, et al
as 21-36040
Plaintiff / Appellant: HUNG DANG
Defendant / Appellee: KIMBERLY MOORE, M.D., MARK ADAMS, M.D., Former Chief Medical Officer for FHS, KETUL PATEL, Chief Executive Officer for FHS and others
Defendant: MARK JOHNSON, MQAC member, WILLIAM M. BRUEGGEMANN, MQAC member, RICK J. GLEIN, MQAC staff attorney and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?