Cases 21 - 30 of 180
David WoodwardIn re: David Woodward
as 22-80069
Respondent:
In re: DAVID WOODWARD, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: May 5, 2003
Roger Leishman
as 22-80065
Respondent:
In re: ROGER LEISHMAN, Admitted to the Bar of the Nnth Circuit: May 15, 1992
Kenneth BemisIn re: Kenneth Bemis
as 22-80045
Respondent:
In re: KENNETH P. BEMIS, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: May 4, 2004
Dale CookIn re: Dale Cook
as 22-80022
Respondent:
In re: DALE COOK, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: May 16, 2019
Micah FargeyIn re: Micah Fargey
as 22-80024
Respondent:
In re: MICAH D. FARGEY, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: May 9, 2017
Lantz Retirement Investments,, et al v. Brian Glover, et al
as 22-15171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANTZ RETIREMENT INVESTMENTS, LLC, a California limited liability company, ANTHONY E. HOGG, as trustee of The Anthony and Stacy L. Hogg Family Trust dated November 18, 2005, FRED PORTER, as trustee of the Profit Sharing Plan Trust 2 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN GLOVER, an individual, MESA SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY, LLC/COURTYARD TOWERS, Mesa, Arizona, an Oregon limited liability company, GREGORY RODERICK, an individual and others
Garbis Etmekjian
as 22-80009
Respondent:
In re: GARBIS N. ETMEKJIAN, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit, May 4, 1991
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-16347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, H. WICKHAM, Deputy Dir. of NDOC, COLLMAN, S C/O Mailroom Super and others
Defendant:
BRIAN SANDEVAL, ADAM LAXSULT, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Peter Thompson v. Gregg Sullivan, et al
as 21-35528
Defendant / Appellee:
SANDRA RUMMEL, RANDY SULLIVAN, MARK CARPENTER, City of Bozeman, Police Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER THOMPSON
Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Andy Do, et al
as 21-16148
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDY DO, HUNG MAI and HONG NGUYEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
