Cases 21 - 30 of 1,739
Rossi, et al. v. Becker, et al.
as 24-2565
Petitioner:
STEPHEN ROSSI, KIM STEVENSON and HOWARD TARLOW
Respondent:
GREG W. BECKER, DANIEL J. BECK, KAREN HON and others
Daniels v. Los Angeles County Superior Court
as 24-2528
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE C. DANIELS
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, et al. v. Biden, et al.
as 24-2533
Plaintiff:
ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPORT AUTHORITY, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH, ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF ALASKA, NATIVE VILLAGE OF VENETIE TRIBAL GOVERNMENT, VENETIE VILLAGE COUNCIL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Interior and others
Li, et al. v. Arcsoft, Inc., et al.
as 24-2531
Plaintiff:
LEI LI, an individual, STRONG WEALTH INVESTMENT LIMITED, a British Virgin Islands Company and PACIFIC SMILE LIMITED, a British Virgin Islands Company
Defendant:
ARCSOFT, INC., a California Corporation, MICHAEL DENG, an individual, DANIEL MACKEIGAN, an individual and others
Alotaibi v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 24-2523
Petitioner:
MAZEN ALOTAIBI
Respondent:
NETHANJAH BREITENBACH, CHARLES DANIELS and LOVELOCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Espinosa v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2466
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ESPINOSA
Defendant:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, CHARLES DANIELS, NDOC Director, HAROLD WICKHAM, NDOC Deputy Director FAC #23 and others
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2365
Plaintiff:
TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Loyd v. Alvarez, et al.
as 24-2374
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAY LOYD
Defendant:
V. ALVAREZ, M.D., W. PAYNE and BRYANT, Sgt.
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2358
Plaintiff:
TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Ani v. Garland
as 24-2339
Petitioner:
DANIEL TOCHUKWU ANI
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
