Cases 21 - 30 of 235
Cristobal Francisco, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3691
Petitioner:
RAQUEL CRISTOBAL FRANCISCO and FRANKLIN ALFREDO MIGUEL CRISTOBAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Franklin v. United States of America
as 23-3511
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC QUINN FRANKLIN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Franklin v. Aguirre
as 23-1881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY FRANKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT R. AGUIRRE
Jesse Swartz, Jr. v. USDC-CASF
as 23-70140
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ, Jr. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
United States of America v. Swartz
as 23-1159
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ
United States of America v. Martinez
as 23-1125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANKLIN ALEXANDER MARTINEZ
Kenneth Leaming v. USDC-WAWSE
as 23-70077
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING, MATTHEW SAMPSON, Fiduciary, et ux., V.A. Chief of Police doing business as Lt. J. Doe, et ux., VA Police, MICHAEL J. FRANKLIN, Director, Fiduciary, et ux., V.A. Police Service and others
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Atlantic-Pacific Processing Systems NV Corp. v. Daniel Plaut, et al
as 23-15604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ATLANTIC-PACIFIC PROCESSING SYSTEMS NV CORP.
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL PLAUT, ALLAN INTRATOR, AKA Alan Intrator, AKA Allen Intrator, TH QUALITY, LLC and others
Meor Adlin, et al v. All Nippon Airways
as 23-15118
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MEOR ADLIN, FRANKLIN AJAYE, ANDREW BARTON and others
Appellant:
XANADU CORP. and DAVID GOULD
Defendant:
ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
