Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 511
Ramos Merino, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1134
Petitioner: SAUL PABLO RAMOS MERINO, GRACIEL A RAMOS-PUEL, DAPHNE F RAMOS-PUEL and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Ramos
as 24-785
Defendant: GENARO RAMOS and Bandit
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Caraffa v. Unknown Leon, et al.
as 24-681
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant / Appellee: UNKNOWN LEON, c/o mail/property officer at Rincon, UNKNOWN RAMOS, housing unit 5 correctional officer, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as unknown unlawful employees of ASPC- Tucson and others
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Melchor-Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-223
Petitioner: ROFINO MELCHOR-RAMOS, LISSETH SOTO-CUYAMANI, SCARLETT MELCHOR-SOTO and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martins, et al. v. Garland
as 24-86
Petitioner: REGINALDO MARTINS, YASMIN RAMOS MARTINS, FABIANA PEREIRA RAMOS MARTINS and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reyes De Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4391
Petitioner: ALEXANDRA REYES DE RAMOS, GERARDO RAMOS REYES, ISABEL RAMOS REYES and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Melchor-Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4265
Petitioner: ANA MELCHOR-RAMOS and KELLER ESCOBAR-MELCHOR
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ruiz Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3834
Petitioner: JULIA MARINA RUIZ RAMOS and CHELSEY YAHAIRA FELIPE RUIZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos-Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3774
Petitioner: ERICA RAMOS-RAMOS, SARA LUPITA CARRILLO-RAMOS and SANTA ROSA CARRILLO-RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?