Cases 21 - 30 of 832
Delgado, et al. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
as 24-1845
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOWEN DELGADO, ROBIN BECERRA, STEVE BOZAN and others
Defendant:
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, an employee health and welfare plan under he Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Torres-Chinos v. Garland
as 24-1730
Petitioner:
BERNABE TORRES-CHINOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ayala Rosas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1449
Petitioner:
DORA ALICIA AYALA ROSAS, CRISTIAN ALEXIS TORRES AYALA, KIMBERLY TORRES AYALA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Torres Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1004
Petitioner:
SANDRA CAROLINA TORRES MARTINEZ and CARLOS DANIEL MARTINEZ TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Torres, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al.
as 24-907
Respondent:
ROMULO TORRES and SAM ROSENFIELD, individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Petitioner:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
BOTANIC TONICS, LLC, NOWHERE PARTNERS, LLC and HYDRA623 HOLDINGS, LLC
Orduno Torres, et al. v. Garland
as 24-844
Petitioner:
JESUS ORDUNO TORRES, CRISTIAN ROSARIO TORRES ORDUNO, NEYLI JIMENA TORRES ORDUNO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Estrada-Hurtado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-702
Petitioner:
EDWIN TOMAS ESTRADA-HURTADO, DELMY ARELY TORRES-DE ESTRADA, CAMILA ALEXANDRA ESTRADA-TORRES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Torres v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, et al.
as 24-514
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALEXANDER TORRES
Defendant / Appellant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, JIMMIE GATES, No. 111207 and others
Gomez-Torres v. Garland
as 24-484
Petitioner:
MIGUEL GOMEZ-TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez-Santamaria, et al. v. Garland
as 24-389
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN ENOC RODRIGUEZ-SANTAMARIA, MORENA ABIGAIL TORRES-HERNANDEZ and MAYERLI ESTEFANI RODRIGUEZ-TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
