Cases 31 - 40 of 97,769
United States of America v. Wilson
as 24-3413
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JACOB EDWIN WILSON
Godfrey v. Costner, et al.
as 24-3415
Plaintiff:
DIANE K. GODFREY
Defendant:
KEVIN COSTNER, HARRISON FORD, SPENCER WRIGHT and others
Yessaian v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, et al.
as 24-3418
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L. YESSAIAN
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and ADVANCED ACCELERATOR APPLICATIONS USA INC
Cambridge Real Estate Services, Inc., et al. v. Griggs, et al.
as 24-3410
Plaintiff:
CAMBRIDGE REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC. and OSWEGO GARDENS JP, LLC
Defendant:
BRYAN GRIGGS and REBECCA JACKSON
Graven v. Snow, et al.
as 24-3420
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. GRAVEN
Defendant:
G. MURRAY SNOW, DISTRICT JUDGE, being sued as an individual and as a federal judge, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE, being sued as an individual and as a federal judge, J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, CIRCUIT JUDGE, being sued as an individual and as a federal judge and others
Cooley v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-3398
Plaintiff:
NATHAN COOLEY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ECL NINE LP and LOCKHART GROUP, LLC
Duarte-Sanchez v. Garland
as 24-3403
Petitioner:
MAURICIO ENRIQUE DUARTE-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez-Ramirez v. Garland
as 24-3402
Petitioner:
CIPRIANO GONZALEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Anbang Group Holdings Co. Limited, et al. v. Zhou, et al.
as 24-3419
Not Yet Classified:
AB STABLE IX LLC, AB STABLE VIII LLC, ANBANG GROUP HOLDINGS CO. LIMITED and others
Defendant:
HAIBIN ZHOU, also known as Hai Bin Zhou also known as Andrew Zhou also known as Andy Bang also known as Joe Martin, WORLD AWARD FOUNDATION INC., YAN ZHAO, ATTORNEY and others
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC v. trx.com, et al.
as 24-3391
Plaintiff:
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC
Defendant:
TRX.COM and LOO TZE MING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
