Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 52
David Arnold v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 19-35007
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN DOE, #2, JOHN DOE, #3, JOHN DOE, #1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID RAY ARNOLD
Mikeal Stine v. USDC-CALA
as 14-73124
: In re: MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Petitioner: MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: CHARLES THOMAS WEEKS, II, United States Marshal, JOHN DOE 1, United States Marshal, JOHN DOE 2, United States Marshal and others
Oregon Prescription Drug Monit, et al v. USDEA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-35402
Plaintiff - Appellee: OREGON PRESCRIPTION DRUG MONITORING PROGRAM, an agency of the State of Oregon
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee: ACLU FOUNDATION OF OREGON, INC., JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Defendant - Appellant: U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendant in Intervention
John Doe #1, et al v. Sam Reed, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-35854
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN DOE #1, an individual, JOHN DOE #2, an individual and PROTECT MARRIAGE WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee: SAM REED, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and BRENDA GALARZA, in her official capacity as Public records Officer for the Secretary of State of Washington
Ronald Baugh v. USDC-ORP
as 10-73876
: In re: RONALD M. BAUGH
Petitioner: RONALD M. BAUGH
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Real Party In Interest: MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States of America, in his individual and official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
John Doe #1, et al v. Washington Families Standing T, et al
as 09-35863
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN DOE #1, an individual, JOHN DOE #2, an individual and PROTECT MARRIAGE WASHINGTON
Intervenor - Appellant: WASHINGTON FAMILIES STANDING TOGETHER
Defendant: SAM REED, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and BRENDA GALARZA, in her official capacity as Public records Officer for the Secretary of State of Washington
John Doe #1, et al v. Arthur West
as 09-35832
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN DOE #1, an individual, JOHN DOE #2, an individual and PROTECT MARRIAGE WASHINGTON
Appellant: ARTHUR SCOTT WEST, I
Defendant: SAM REED, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and BRENDA GALARZA, in her official capacity as Public records Officer for the Secretary of State of Washington
John Doe #1, et al v. Washington Coalition for Open, et al
as 09-35826
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN DOE #1, an individual, JOHN DOE #2, an individual and PROTECT MARRIAGE WASHINGTON
Defendant: SAM REED, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and BRENDA GALARZA, in her official capacity as Public records Officer for the Secretary of State of Washington
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant: WASHINGTON COALITION FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT
: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF WASHINGTON
John Doe #1, et al v. Sam Reed, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-35818
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN DOE #1, an individual, JOHN DOE #2, an individual and PROTECT MARRIAGE WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: SAM REED, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and BRENDA GALARZA, in her official capacity as Public records Officer for the Secretary of State of Washington
: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF WASHINGTON
Ronald Baugh v. USDC-ORP
as 09-71084
: In re: RONALD M. BAUGH
Petitioner: RONALD M. BAUGH
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Real Party In Interest: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINSTRATION and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?