Cases 71 - 80 of 143
Edward Terrell v. Mike McDonald
as 12-70094
Petitioner:
EDWARD TERRELL
Respondent:
MIKE MCDONALD, Warden
Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla & v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 11-57222
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LOS COYOTES BAND OF CAHUILLA & CUPENO INDIANS
Defendant - Appellant:
KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, LARRY ECHO HAWK, Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, JASON THOMPSON, Acting Deputy Director of the Office of Justice Legal Services and others
Ramiro Garcia v. Mike McDonald
as 11-73211
Petitioner:
RAMIRO GARCIA
Respondent:
MIKE MCDONALD, Warden
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-17143
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STEWART & JASPER ORCHARDS and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and THE BAY INSTITUTE
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-17144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STEWART & JASPER ORCHARDS and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Defendant:
LESTER A. SNOW
Intervenor-Defendant:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and THE BAY INSTITUTE
Kenneth Stidham v. Jim McDonald
as 11-72590
Petitioner:
KENNETH JEROME STIDHAM
Respondent:
JIM MCDONALD
Kenneth Stidham v. Jim McDonald
as 11-72526
Petitioner:
KENNETH JEROME STIDHAM
Respondent:
JIM MCDONALD
William Coats v. Michael McDonald
as 11-72443
Petitioner:
WILLIAM THOMAS COATS
Respondent:
MICHAEL MCDONALD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
