Cases 71 - 80 of 446
Mejia Mejia v. Garland
as 22-596
Petitioner:
LINDA JESUS MEJIA MEJIA, JOSTHIN ANAEL BRIZUELA MEJIA, MIGUEL ALEXANDER TALABERA MEJIA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez Mejia v. Garland
as 21-1042
Petitioner:
SULY DE JESUS LOPEZ MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mejia-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 21-477
Petitioner:
LESLY JEAKELIN MEJIA-LOPEZ and JOSE DANIEL DUBON-MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mejia-Rivera v. Garland
as 22-333
Petitioner:
CECIA MEJIA-RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mejia-Celaya v. Garland
as 21-98
Petitioner:
RUBEN ANTONIO MEJIA-CELAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Molina-Mejia, et al. v. Garland
as 21-436
Petitioner:
FERNANDO JOSE MOLINA-MEJIA, NAYELY BRIYITH MEJIA and ARELI VILEX MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivas-Cornejo v. Garland
as 21-1187
Petitioner:
YANIRA BERFALIA RIVAS-CORNEJO and CLAUDIA ELIZABETH MEJIA-RIVAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Guillermo Trujillo v. L. Gonzalez, et al
as 21-17064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO, AKA Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Defendant / Appellee:
L. GONZALEZ, C/O at NKSP, J. RAMIREZ, C/O at NKSP, MEJIA, C/O at NKSP and others
Jilanne Barto v. David Miyashiro, et al
as 21-56223
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILANNE D. BARTO
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID MIYASHIRO, In his official capacity as Superintendent Cajon Valley Union School District, JAMES MILLER, each in their official capacity as Trustee of Cajon Valley Union School District Board of Trustees, JO ALEGRIA and others
Defendant:
DOES, 1-50, inclusive
Denise Mejia v. Wesley Miller, et al
as 21-56282
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DENISE MEJIA, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
WESLEY MILLER, Bureau of Land Management Officer, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
