Cases 81 - 90 of 362
Erick Medina-Moreno v. William Barr
as 20-71300
Petitioner:
ERICK JESUS MEDINA-MORENO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Jian Na Wu v. AIM United, LLC, et al
as 20-55488
Defendant:
RYAN MARK, an individual, BDR, INC., a California corporation, DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIAN NA WU, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN ANGEL, an individual and AIM UNITED, LLC, a California limited liability company
Julio Medina Melendez v. William Barr
as 20-71266
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR MEDINA MELENDEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Adam Fodrey v. City of Rialto, et al
as 20-55474
Defendant / Appellee:
RORY SCALF, ROBERT MUNGUIA, JOHNNY PATRIDA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM FODREY
Defendant:
DOES
USA v. Omar Perez-Medina
as 20-50106
Defendant / Appellant:
OMAR PEREZ-MEDINA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael McLaughlin v. Shannon McCloud, et al
as 20-35339
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY L. SMITH, AMY FENSKE, MATTHIAS C. CICOTTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL L. MCLAUGHLIN
ITN Flix, LLC, et al v. Gloria Hinojosa, et al
as 20-55348
Defendant / Appellee:
EL CHINGON, INC., a Texas corporation, GLORIA HINOJOSA, an individual, AMSTEL EISENSTADT FRAZIER AND HINOJOSA TALENT AGENCY, a California corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GIL MEDINA, an individual and ITN FLIX, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability company
Luis Medina Posada v. William Barr
as 20-70604
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO MEDINA POSADA, AKA Luis A. Medina, AKA Luis Medina-Posada
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Carla Paitamala-Saenz v. William Barr
as 20-70468
Petitioner:
CARLA PAITAMALA-SAENZ, AKA Carla Ferrari, AKA Maria Ilda Medina-Falconi
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
USA v. Erik Camacho-Medina
as 20-10061
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIK ISAAC CAMACHO-MEDINA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
