Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Cortez-Diaz v. Garland
as 24-2987
Petitioner: DORA BEATRIZ CORTEZ-DIAZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Medina-Ventura, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1651
Petitioner: DORA ISABEL MEDINA-VENTURA and MIA KIMBERLY ESTRADA-MEDINA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ayala Rosas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1449
Petitioner: DORA ALICIA AYALA ROSAS, CRISTIAN ALEXIS TORRES AYALA, KIMBERLY TORRES AYALA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Amaya, et al. v. Menzies Aviation Usa Inc
as 24-974
Respondent: DORA PATRICIA AMAYA, an individual and ANIBAL SILVA, an individual, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated
Petitioner: MENZIES AVIATION USA INC
Revolorio Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4052
Petitioner: HENRY ONAN REVOLORIO LOPEZ, DORA A BARRERA PEREZ and IKER GABRIEL REVOLORIO BARRERA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Molina-Bonilla, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3590
Petitioner: GALILEO MOLINA-BONILLA, KEVIN MOLINA-MORALES, MARIA DORA MORALES DE MOLINA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fox Salerno v. USDC-AZP
as 22-70259
Not Classified By Court: In re: FOX JOSEPH SALERNO, DORA B. SCHRIRO, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner: FOX JOSEPH SALERNO
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Lopez-De Escobar, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1340
Petitioner: DORA NOEMI LOPEZ-DE ESCOBAR and HEISY NOEMI ESCOBAR-LOPEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Benitez-De Pena, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1286
Petitioner: DORA ALICIA BENITEZ-DE PENA and JENNIFER ANTONIA PENA-BENITEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mendez Diaz v. Garland
as 22-707
Petitioner: DORA YOLANDA MENDEZ DIAZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?