Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 82
San Luis Obispo County Homeless Union, et al. v. County of San Luis Obispo, et al.
as 24-2575
Plaintiff: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY HOMELESS UNION, a local affiliate of the California Homeless Union, on behalf of itself, its members and current and former residents of Oklahoma Parking Site, DAVID RICHFORD, DAN RICHFORD and others
Defendant: COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES DIVISION, DEVIN DRAKE, in his official capacity as Director of Social Services and others
Cunningham v. Fortney, et al.
as 24-1914
Plaintiff: BRADLY M. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant: ADAM FORTNEY, Snohomish County Sheriff, STAN WHITE, Chief of Police, Mill Creek, WA, MIKE REESE, Director of Corrections on behalf of State of Oregon and others
Spengler v. Boy Scouts of America, et al.
as 24-522
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL R. SPENGLER
Defendant / Appellee: BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, VINE CHURCH, TTCF ADMINISTRATION, individuall capacity and others
Johnson, et al. v. Myers, et al.
as 24-349
Plaintiff / Appellee: ROSE JOHNSON, individually, and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan M. Smith, and behalf of all beneficiaries, MARK SMITH, KAHLLENA A. SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER MYERS and RYAN BEECROFT
Defendant: CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, DANIEL JOHNSON and DOES, 1-50
Hukill v. State of California, et al.
as 24-268
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON SCOTT HUKILL
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SEAN LAFFERTY, Judge, JAMES NEAVITT and others
Morgan, et al. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation, et al.
as 23-4236
Plaintiff / Appellee: NATHANIEL MORGAN, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and MICHAEL BEVAN, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION, doing business as UTC Aerospace Systems doing business as Collins Aerospace, ROHR INC, UNITED TECHNOLOGY TRADE CORP. and others
Mehl v. LG Chem Ltd., et al.
as 23-3943
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATHAN MEHL
Defendant / Appellee: LG CHEM LTD. and DOES 1-50
City of Huntington Beach, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
as 23-3694
Plaintiff / Appellant: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California Charter City and Municipal Corporation, HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, TONY STRICKLAND, Mayor of Huntington Beach and others
Defendant / Appellee: GAVIN NEWSOM, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California, GUSTAVO VELASQUEZ, in his official capacity as Director of the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development, CALIFORNIA STATE LEGISLATURE and others
Tat v. State of California, et al.
as 23-3663
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROOZBEH TAT
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Attorney General (Xavier Becerra) official capacity, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Attorney General (Xavier Becerra) Official capacity, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, Attorney General (Xavier Becerra) official capacity and others
Stendal v. Memorial Health Services, et al.
as 23-3561
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMY L. STENDAL, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated.
Defendant / Appellant: MEMORIAL HEALTH SERVICES, a California Nonprofit Corporation and LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, a California Nonprofit Corporation
Defendant: MILLER CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LONG BEACH AUXILIARY, INC., a California Nonprofit Corporation and DOES, 1-50, inclusive

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?