Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Long v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al.
as 24-1557
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. LONG
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, 3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Maria Varney v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporati, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-35859
Defendant / Appellee:
WEIR VALVES & CONTROLS USA INC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, JOHN CRANE, INC. and others
Defendant:
VIKING PUMP, INC., ALFA LAVAL, INC., SB DECKING, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIA VARNEY, Individually and as Personal Representative for the Estate of Donald Varney
FMC Corporation v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribe
as 17-35865
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FMC CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES
FMC Corporation v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 17-35840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FMC CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES
Ellis Staton, et al v. USDC-CAC
as 09-72230
:
In re: ELLIS MICHAEL STATON and SUSAN MARY STATON
Petitioner:
ELLIS MICHAEL STATON and SUSAN MARY STATON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
THE WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY, AKA Garnder Denver Nash, LLC, JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, individually and as successor-Central Environmental Systems, Inc., FKA Borg-Warner Central Environmental Systems, Inc. and others
USA, et al v. FMC Corporation
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 06-35429
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FMC CORPORATION
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.