Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Medrano Calderon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3468
Petitioner:
FATIMA MEDRANO CALDERON, ANDERSON GONZALEZ and OSCAR GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Arzate Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3383
Petitioner:
FLORINDA ARZATE HERNANDEZ, FATIMA VALERIA JIMENEZ ARZATE and EMMANUEL JIMENEZ ARZATE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alas Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3276
Petitioner:
FATIMA DEL ROSARIO ALAS GOMEZ and AXEL ALESSANDRO MONGE ALAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Warren v. Hilton Grand Vacations, et al.
as 24-2171
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
HILTON GRAND VACATIONS, MARK WANG, JERRY BUTCHER and others
Warren v. Hilton Grand Vacations, et al.
as 24-2098
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
HILTON GRAND VACATIONS, MARK WANG, [61] AC, JERRY BUTCHER, [61] AC and others
Barrett Business Services, Inc. v. Colmenero, et al.
as 24-2032
Plaintiff:
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES COLMENERO, DENELL HOPKINS, SANTIAGO ALEJO and others
Warren v. Hilton Grand Vacations, et al.
as 24-833
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
HILTON GRAND VACATIONS, MARK WANG, [61] AC, JERRY BUTCHER, [61] AC and others
Barrett Business Services, Inc. v. Colmenero, et al.
as 24-770
Plaintiff:
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES COLMENERO, DENELL HOPKINS, and the marital community comprised thereof, SANTIAGO ALEJO and others
Swahili, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, et al.
as 24-37
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERRAD PERNELL SWAHILI and FATIMA SWAHILI
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS and others
Cortez Perez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3517
Petitioner:
ANGELICA CORTEZ PEREZ, FATIMA ANAHI ANDRADE CORTEZ, DULCE VALERIA ANDRADE CORTEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
