Cases 1 - 10 of 2,245
Garcia Pablo v. Garland
as 24-3573
Petitioner:
FLORENTIN GARCIA PABLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Shotwell v. Chavez-Epperson, et al.
as 24-3459
Plaintiff:
MANUEL EUGENE SHOTWELL
Defendant:
CHAVEZ-EPPERSON, DELANEY, E. MEDINA and others
Lugo Vanegas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3385
Petitioner:
MARIA DOLLY LUGO VANEGAS and DIEGO ALEJANDRO GARCIA LUGO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Garcia-Ruiz v. Garland
as 24-3217
Petitioner:
ALEX ADAN GARCIA-RUIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Marin v. Lee, et al.
as 24-3186
Plaintiff:
MEL M. MARIN, AKA: Mel Marinkovic
Defendant:
ADRIENNE LEE, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and their Personal Capacities, KENDYL MAGNUSON, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and their Personal Capacities, STAR RIVERA-LACEY, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and their Personal Capacities and others
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Petersen, et al.
as 24-3188
Plaintiff:
MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Intervenor:
WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Diaz-Buitrago, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3125
Petitioner:
BRANDON DIAZ-BUITRAGO, VIKY ORREGO-GARCIA and MELANY LOPEZ-ORREGO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tobon-Garcia v. Garland
as 24-3152
Petitioner:
LICEL TOBON-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nieves-Garcia v. Garland
as 24-3120
Petitioner:
JOSE ALFREDO NIEVES-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Garcia Guillen v. Garland
as 24-3117
Petitioner:
HENRY ADRIAN GARCIA GUILLEN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
