Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Petersen, et al.
as 24-3188
Plaintiff: MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant: ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Intervenor: WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Sanchez v. County of Graham, et al.
as 24-1675
Plaintiff: DEBORAH SANCHEZ, an adult individual
Defendant: COUNTY OF GRAHAM, a government entity, PJ ALLRED, Graham County Sheriff, a government officer/jural entity, ARTHUR PEREZ, JR., husband and others
Schultz v. County of San Joaquin, et al.
as 24-692
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL SCHULTZ
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, AYERS, Deputy Sheriff, UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LP and others
Graham v. Highberger
as 24-65
Petitioner / Appellant: CLIFFORD JOE GRAHAM
Respondent / Appellee: JOSHUA HIGHBERGER, Superintendent Oregon State Correctional Institution
Serrato v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 23-3348
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL ANGELO SERRATO
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ROMMEL CHAVEZ, Long Beach Police Officer, individual, Deputy BALTAZAR, ID No 528239, Deputy for (MCJ) 2nd Floor FM Shift, individual and others
Haynes, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 23-3327
Plaintiff: CHERYL COTTERILL
Defendant / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant: MATHEW MASON, HUGH HALL, GREGORY HICKS and others
Not Yet Classified: GREGORY MELVIN HAYNES, ATTORNEY, counsel for plaintiff
Ben Toma, et al v. USDC-AZPIn re: Ben Toma, et al v. USDC-AZP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-70179
Not Classified By Court: In re: BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, in his official Capacity, WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, in his official capacity, MI FAMILIA VOTA and others
Petitioner: BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, in his official capacity
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Fiyyaz Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16419
Defendant / Appellant: ACCEL GROWTH FUND INVESTORS 2016 L.L.C., GRAHAM SMITH, SOCIAL+CAPITAL PARTNERSHIP GP II L.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: FIYYAZ PIRANI
Amicus Curiae: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL VENTURE CAPITAL ASSOCIATION, SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION and others
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Kristin Mayes, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-15234
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee: KRISTIN K. MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, JENNIFER CUNICO, o in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor: BEN TOMA and WARREN PETERSEN
National Public Radio, et al v. United States Central Command, et al
as 23-55062
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO and GRAHAM SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?