Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Paul Adams v. USDC-CASD
as 13-72895
:
In re: PAUL ADAMS
Petitioner:
PAUL ADAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Real Party In Interest:
AL LOPEZ, Doctor Medical Provider, K. BALL, CMO Physician, Health Care Manager, D. HJERPE, Chief Physician and Surgeon and others
Samuel Anderson v. USDC-SAC
as 13-72893
:
In re: SAMUEL ANDERSON
Petitioner:
SAMUEL ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
J. CLARK KELSO, Receiver, T. KIMURA-YIP, Associate Director, California Prison Health Care, J. WALKER, Chief, Office of Third Level Appeals - Health Care and others
Samuel Anderson v. USDC-SAC
as 13-71813
:
In re: SAMUEL ANDERSON
Petitioner:
SAMUEL ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
J. CLARK KELSO, Receiver, T. KIMURA-YIP, Associate Director, California Prison Health Care, J. WALKER, Chief, Office of Third Level Appeals - Health Care and others
Matthew Jennings v. USDC-SAC
as 13-70462
:
In re: MATTHEW G. JENNINGS
Petitioner:
MATTHEW G. JENNINGS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
A. MORELAND, Correctional Officer, E. BARTEL, Correctional Officer, SECLUNA, Correctional Officer and others
Rodney Womack v. USDCSF
as 10-71807
:
In re: RODNEY JEROME WOMACK
Petitioner:
RODNEY JEROME WOMACK
Respondent:
USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
J. WALKER, Warden
Ricky Hammonds v. J. Walker
as 09-72875
Petitioner:
RICKY DARNELL HAMMONDS
Respondent:
M. MARTEL and J. WALKER
Gerald Payne v. USDC-CES
as 08-73982
:
In re: GERALD J. PAYNE
Petitioner:
GERALD J. PAYNE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
J. WALKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
