Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Nguyen, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-2036
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE NGUYEN, DOMINIC BOGUSKI, JAY MEDINA and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her capacity as the Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Miller, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 23-2979
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES MILLER, SAN DIEGO COUNTY GUN OWNERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, WENDY HAUFFEN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in their official capacity, ALLISON MENDOZA, In their official capacity, BRENT ORRICK, in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms and others
Lana Renna, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LANA RAE RENNA, DANIELLE JAYMES, HANNAH SPOUSTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her official capacity as Director of Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE STATES OF COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, and RHODE ISLAND, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
James Miller, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 21-55608
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAN DIEGO COUNTY GUN OWNERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, PWGG, L.P., GUNFIGHTER TACTICAL, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and LUIS LOPEZ, in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ARIZONA, and 21 other states
USA v. David Phillips
as 18-50138
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID PHILLIPS, AKA David John Phillips
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
