Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Cabe v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
as 24-3778
Petitioner:
JOHN CECIL CABE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Interested Party:
MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH ANTELOPE VALLEY COURTHOUSE
Wilson v. Tahbazof, et al.
as 24-1732
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DARIO WILSON
Defendant:
SUFI TAHBAZOF, Atlas Property Group, LLC, 345 6th LLC, 363 6th, LLC, JOHN O'CONNOR, Agent and MICHAEL D. KERWIN
Salisbury v. O'Malley
as 24-425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. SALISBURY
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Lecia Shorter v. USDC-CALA
as 23-70039
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LECIA L. SHORTER, LEROY BACA, GLORIA MOLINA and others
Petitioner:
LECIA L. SHORTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Michael Brown v. CIR
as 23-70009
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Laurieann Shoemaker, et al v. Zions Bancorporation, N.A., et al
as 22-35558
Appellant:
LAURIEANN SHOEMAKER and JOSEPH E. BEUMELER
Appellee:
ZIONS BANCORPORATION, N.A., FKA ZB, NA, DBA Zions First National Bank, ZIONS BANK, CLINT NEF and others
Michael Brown v. CIR
as 22-70001
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
USA v. Michael Miller
as 21-30230
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. MILLER
Jones Day v. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, et al
as 21-16642
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONES DAY
Respondent / Appellee:
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP, MICHAEL D. TORPEY and MITCHELL ZUKLIE
Anthony DeFrancesco v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al
as 21-16530
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY T. DEFRANCESCO
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, ROBERT C. ROBBINS, in his individual capacity, MICHAEL D. DAKE, in his individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
