Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Stephen Hill, et al v. City of Fountain Valley, et al
as 21-55867
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN DOUGLAS HILL, TERESA ANN HILL, BENJAMIN HILL, as guardian ad litem for his minor children C.H. and A.H. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, STUART R. CHASE, GANNON P. KELLY and others
Defendant:
DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Michael Hill v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 20-16305
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. BANK, N.A. and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
MTC FINANCIAL, INC., DBA Trustee Corps
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL HILL
Scott Camirand v. Brad Cain, et al
as 20-35307
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HILL, Individually and in his official capacity as a Correctional Lieutenant at the Snake River Correctional Institution, BRAD CAIN, Individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Snake River Correctional Institution and JOHN DOES, 1-10; Individually and in their official capacities as employees of the Oregon Department of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT LEANDER CAMIRAND
FTC v. Commerce Planet, Inc., et al
as 14-56528
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
COMMERCE PLANET, INC., a corporation, MICHAEL HILL and AARON GRAVITZ
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES GUGLIUZZA
Third-party-defendant:
SUPERFLY ADVERTISING, INC., a Delaware corporation, FKA Morlex, Inc. and SUPERFLY ADVERTISING, INC., an Indiana corporation
FTC v. Commerce Planet, Inc., et al
as 12-57064
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
COMMERCE PLANET, INC., a corporation, MICHAEL HILL and AARON GRAVITZ
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES GUGLIUZZA
Third-party-defendant:
SUPERFLY ADVERTISING, INC., a Delaware corporation, FKA Morlex, Inc. and SUPERFLY ADVERTISING, INC., an Indiana corporation
USA v. Donald Hill
as 09-10383
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD MICHAEL HILL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
