Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Safari Club International, et al v. Rob Bonta
as 23-15199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, an Arizona nonprofit corporation, UNITED STATES SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, an Ohio nonprofit corporation and CONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATION
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USFS, et al
as 21-15907
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC. and NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a United States Government Agency
State of Washington, et al v. DOS, et al
as 20-35391
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls, CORDELL HULL, BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
FREDRIC'S ARMS & SMITHS, LLC and NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USFS, et al
as 17-15790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB and GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS COUNCIL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a United States Government Agency
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USFS, et al
as 17-15790
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. and NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a United States Government Agency
Ivan Pena, et al v. Stephen Lindley
as 15-15449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN PENA, ROY VARGAS, DONA CROSTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN LINDLEY, Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION, LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others
Ivan Pena, et al v. Stephen Lindley
as 15-15449
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY VARGAS, DONA CROSTON, BRETT THOMAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN LINDLEY, Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Leonard Fyock, et al v. City of Sunnyvale, et al
as 14-15408
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROD SWANSON, BRAD SEIFERS, WILLIAM DOUGLAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SUNNYVALE, FRANK GRGURINA, in his official capacity, THE CHIEF OF THE SUNNYVALE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF POLICE OFFICERS, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY, LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others
John Teixeira, et al v. County of Alameda, et al
as 13-17132
Amicus Curiae:
FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, YOUTH ALIVE!, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE NOBRIGA, JOHN TEIXEIRA, GARY GAMAZA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATE MILEY, in his official capacity, ALAMEDA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, as a policy making body, WILMA CHAN, in her official capacity and others
Ctr for Biological Diversity, et al v. USFS
as -16671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB and GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS COUNCIL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
