Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Warren v. Nanos, et al.
as 24-2601
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY LEE WARREN
Defendant:
CHRIS NANOS, Sheriff, LAURA CONOVER, County Attorney, SAMANTHA WALKER, CES Dut and others
Aguilar v. County of Pima, et al.
as 24-2440
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL AGUILAR
Defendant:
COUNTY OF PIMA, CHRIS NANOS, STEPHEN PERKO, per Answer at Doc. 39 and others
Obregon v. Napier, et al.
as 24-350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIO ARMANDO OBREGON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK NAPIER, LAURA CONOVER, CHRIS NANOS and others
Lara-Sanchez v. Garland
as 23-996
Petitioner:
NANO LARA-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Daniella Gracia v. Christopher Nanos, et al
as 21-16902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIELLA MARIE GRACIA
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER NANOS, Pima County Sheriff, OFELIA DORSEY, #7531, Correctional Officer and WILLIAM GRIMSEY, #6095, Correctional Sergeant
Robert Cutler v. Christopher Nanos, et al
as 21-16250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT STEVEN CUTLER, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of David A. Cutler, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all beneficiaries of estate of David A. Cutler deceased; David A. Cutler estate of Renee Luddington Cutler
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER NANOS, Sheriff of Pima County, Arizona, in his official capacity,, KEITH BARNES and JANE DOE BARNES
Defendant:
RURAL/METRO FIRE DEPT., INC., an Arizona for profit corporation, GRAND REED and BRITTANY REED
USA v. Edgar Quiroz Rodriguez
as 21-30147
Defendant / Appellant:
EDGAR OMAR QUIROZ RODRIGUEZ, AKA Midget, AKA Nano, AKA Marcelino Zambrano Rodriguez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Maldonado, et al v. Kempton, et al
as 06-15657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NANO MALDONADO
Defendant:
JEFF MORALES, in his capacity as Director of the California Department of Transportation
Defendant - Appellee:
WILL KEMPTON, in his capacity as Director of the California Department of Transportation
Amicus Curiae:
CALIFORNIA STATE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
