Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Frederick Bates v. City of San Jose, et al
as 21-16867
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK BATES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN JOSE, ROBERT DAVIS, individually and in his official capacity as City of San Jose Chief of Police, ADONNA AMOROSO, individually and in her official capacity as City of San Jose Deputy Chief of Police and others
Frederick Bates v. City of San Jose, et al
as 21-16459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK BATES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN JOSE, ROBERT DAVIS, individually and in his official capacity as City of San Jose Chief of Police, ADONNA AMOROSO, individually and in her official capacity as City of San Jose Deputy Chief of Police and others
Paul Hupp, et al v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Assoc, et al
as 20-56004
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY MICHAEL STOH, KEYSTONE PACIFIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC., STEVEN I. MEHLMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ARISTEA HUPP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL HUPP
Paul Hupp v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Assoc, et al
as 20-56202
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY MICHAEL STOH, KEYSTONE PACIFIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC., SAMUEL ROJAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL HUPP
David Nelson v. USDCOAK
as 10-70822
:
In re: DAVID J. NELSON
Petitioner:
DAVID J. NELSON
Respondent:
USDC, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
ROBERT DAVIS NEAL
SW Center Biological, et al v. Bldg Industry, et al
as 06-56851
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, WETLANDS ACTION NETWORK and others
Defendant:
KEN BERG, Carlsbad Field Supervisor, ANNE BADGLEY, Acting Regional Director, GALE A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior and others
Defendant-cross-defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
Defendant-intervenor:
PARDEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant:
BUILDING INDUSTRY LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, CALIFORNIA BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
