Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Monarrez Pena v. Garland
as 24-304
Petitioner:
SALOMON MONARREZ PENA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55659
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dale Sundby, et al v. USDC-CASD
as 23-70128
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DALE SUNDBY, DALE SUNDBY, Trustee, MARQUEE FUNDING GROUP, INC. and others
Petitioner:
DALE SUNDBY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Dale Sundby v. Marquee Funding Group, Inc., et al
as 21-55582
Defendant / Appellant:
KIMBERLY GILL RABINOFF, JEFFREY MYERS, TODD B. COBIN, Trustee and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DALE SUNDBY, Trustee
Dale Sundby v. Marquee Funding Group, Inc., et al
as 21-55504
Defendant / Appellee:
MARQUEE FUNDING GROUP, INC., VICKIE MCCARTY, ANDRES SALSIDO, Trustee and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALE SUNDBY, Trustee
Salomon Velasquez-Velasquez v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70874
Petitioner:
SALOMON VELASQUEZ-VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Salomon Hernandez-Castro, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70483
Petitioner:
SALOMON HERNANDEZ CASTRO and ALEJANDRINA MALDONADO-JARDINEZ
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General
Ousman Boukar v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-70447
Petitioner:
OUSMAN SALOMON BOUKAR
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General
Dale Sundby v. USDC-CASD
as 20-73530
Not Classified By Court:
KIMBERLY GILL RABINOFF, In re: DALE SUNDBY, CHRISTOPHER MYERS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Petitioner:
DALE SUNDBY
Enma Rosales-Roca, et al v. William Barr
as 20-73119
Petitioner:
GERWIN SALOMON ESTRADA-ROSALES, BRANDEN AMADEO ESTRADA-ROSALES and ENMA ARCELY ROSALES-ROCA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
