Torts - Injury Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 71 - 80 of 102
Vrlina Nozlic v. Evelyn Thomas, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-35572
Defendant - Appellee: EVELYN THOMAS, Circle of Friends (AFH), ERYL WILLIAMS, King County Mental Health Worker, KING COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH and others
Movant - Appellant: VRLINA NOZLIC, ADA Advocate/Rep for plaintiff Andrew Michael Thomas
Fred Macdonald v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-55949
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRED KENNETH MACDONALD
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM PENA, SYEMON KOUROUNIS and others
Gerold Davis v. James Foster, et al
as 11-57104
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEROLD L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES LEE FOSTER, Sheriff of Newberry County, JAMES P. ROGES, Attorney for the plaintiff, JIMMY PALMER, Arresting Officer Union County SC PD and others
Ingrid Peterson v. William Morris, IV, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-35961
Plaintiff - Appellant: INGRID PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM S. MORRIS, IV, President Morris Communications, Publisher Homer News, LORI EVANS, Editor/Publisher The Homer News and MICHAEL ARMSTRONG, Staff Writer The Homer News
Monica Williams-Harvest v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-17324
Plaintiff - Appellant: MONICA WILLIAMS-HARVEST
Defendant - Appellee: WAL-MART STORES, INC., DBA Wal-Mart Supercenter Store No. 2592
Medifast, Inc., et al v. Robert FitzPatrick, et al
as 11-55699
Plaintiff - Appellee: MEDIFAST, INC., a Delaware corporation and BRADLEY MACDONALD, an individual
Defendant: BARRY MINKOW, an individual, FRAUD DISCOVERY INSTITUTE, INC., a California corporation, TRACY COENEN, an individual and others
Defendant - Appellant: ROBERT L. FITZPATRICK, an individual
Medifast, Inc., et al v. Barry Minkow, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-55687
Plaintiff - Appellant: MEDIFAST, INC., a Delaware corporation and BRADLEY MACDONALD, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: BARRY MINKOW, an individual, FRAUD DISCOVERY INSTITUTE, INC., a California corporation, ROBERT L. FITZPATRICK, an individual and others
Jessica Seymour v. DOD, et al
as 11-55443
Plaintiff - Appellant: JESSICA SEYMOUR
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cherry Dietzmann, et al v. Kevin Guinn, et al
as 10-36149
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHERRY DIETZMANN, individually, J.A., II, minor, by and through his mother and guardian Cherry Dietzmann, AKA Jason Anderson and D.A., minor, by and through her mother and guardian, Cherry Dietzmann, AKA Darla Anderson
Defendant: WILLIAM HUTT, Sergeant, DAVID SHEALY, Officer, STACY LUCK, Officer and others
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S OFFICE UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S OFFICE and CITY OF HOMER
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN GUINN and JOHN OLSON, Jr., in their individual capacities
Third-party-defendant: JASON ANDERSON, Sr.
Cherry Dietzmann, et al v. City of Homer, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-36098
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHERRY DIETZMANN, individually, J.A., II, minor, by and through his mother and guardian Cherry Dietzmann, AKA Jason Anderson and D.A., minor, by and through her mother and guardian, Cherry Dietzmann, AKA Darla Anderson
Defendant - Appellant: WILLIAM HUTT, Sergeant, DAVID SHEALY, Officer and STACY LUCK, Officer
Defendant: THE HOMER POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARK ROBL, Homer Police Chief and LAWRENCE KUHNS, Sergeant
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S OFFICE UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S OFFICE, KEVIN GUINN and others
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellant: CITY OF HOMER
Third-party-defendant: JASON ANDERSON, Sr.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?