Cases 61 - 70 of 142
Oat Solutions, LLC v. Matti Rhiko, et al
as 16-56816
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OAT SOLUTIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTI RHIKO, an individual, VINCENT POUJARDIEU, an individual and RAISIO PLC, a foreign company
Gregory Ingalls, et al v. Spotify USA Inc.
as 16-17238
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY INGALLS and TONY HONG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
SPOTIFY USA INC., a Delaware corporation
Steven Russell, et al v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., et al
as 16-56764
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVEN RUSSELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and DONNA CAFFEY
Objector - Appellant:
BARBARA S. COCHRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., a Delaware Corporation and DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive
Jonathan Kanfer v. PharmaCare US, Inc.
as 16-56710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN KANFER
Defendant - Appellee:
PHARMACARE US, INC., a Delaware Corporation
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56686
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant:
KELLY KRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56688
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant:
GEORGE P. LIACOPOULOS
Defendant - Appellee:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56694
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant:
W. ALLEN MCDONALD, Christopher T Cain for Objector
Defendant - Appellee:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Steven Russell, et al v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., et al
as 16-56696
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVEN RUSSELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and DONNA CAFFEY
Objector - Appellant:
BOBBI CECIO
Defendant - Appellee:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., a Delaware Corporation and DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56684
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56666
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant:
KIMBERLY SMITH and CHRISTINE KNOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
