Labor Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Cherie Mancini, et al v. SEIU, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-17357
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHERIE MANCINI, FREDERICK GUSTAFSON, RAYMOND GARCIA, as a member, and on behalf of Clark County Public Employees Association and others
Defendant - Appellee: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LUISA BLUE, in her official capacity as trustee, MARY K. HENRY, in her official capacity as Union President and others
Steven Buster v. Compensation Committee of the, et al
as 17-16566
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee: STEVEN K. BUSTER
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant: COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MECHANICS BANK, MECHANICS BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN and MECHANICS BANK, a California corporation
Christopher Sulyma v. Intel Corporation Investment P, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-15864
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER M. SULYMA, and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE INTEL CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS, INTEL RETIREMENT PLANS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE and others
Lyms, Inc., et al v. Bruce Millimaki, et al
as 14-55674
Plaintiff - Appellee: LYMS, INC., WENDY YOUNGREN, as successor trustee of the Lymos 401 (K) plan and CATHY MEANS, as successor trustee of the Lymos 401(K) plan
Defendant - Appellant: BRUCE MILLIMAKI, former trustee of the Lymos 401 (K) plan and MICHAEL EGGERT, former trustee of the Lymos 401 (K) plan
Lyms, Inc., et al v. Bruce Millimaki, et al
as 14-55659
Plaintiff - Appellant: LYMS, INC., WENDY YOUNGREN, as successor trustee of the Lymos 401 (K) plan and CATHY MEANS, as successor trustee of the Lymos 401(K) plan
Defendant - Appellee: BRUCE MILLIMAKI, former trustee of the Lymos 401 (K) plan and MICHAEL EGGERT, former trustee of the Lymos 401 (K) plan
K. M., et al v. Regence Blueshield, et al
as 14-35108
Plaintiff - Appellee: K. M., by and through his parents and guardians, L.M. and E.M., individually on behalf of Garrigan Lyman Group Health Benefit Plan, B. S., by and through his parents and guardians, E.S. and R.S., individually on behalf of Garrigan Lyman Group Health Benefit Plan, GARRIGAN LYMAN GROUP HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN and others
Defendant - Appellant: REGENCE BLUESHIELD and CAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., FKA The Regence Group
Ronald Hooks v. Kitsap Tenant Support Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-35912
Petitioner - Appellant: RONALD K. HOOKS, Regional Director of the Nineteenth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent - Appellee: KITSAP TENANT SUPPORT SERVICES, INC.
Lyms, Inc., et al v. Bruce Millimaki, et al
as 13-56329
Plaintiff - Appellee: LYMS, INC., WENDY YOUNGREN, as successor trustee of the Lymos 401 (K) plan and CATHY MEANS, as successor trustee of the Lymos 401(K) plan
Defendant - Appellant: BRUCE MILLIMAKI, former trustee of the Lymos 401 (K) plan and MICHAEL EGGERT, former trustee of the Lymos 401 (K) plan
Ronald Hooks v. ILWU, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-36068
Petitioner - Appellee: RONALD K. HOOKS, Regional Director of the Nineteenth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent - Appellant: INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE AND WAREHOUSE UNION, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE AND WAREHOUSE UNION, LOCAL 8 and INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE AND WAREHOUSE UNION, LOCAL 40
Elizabeth Gardner, et al v. Internal Revenue Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-17632
Plaintiff - Appellant: ELIZABETH GARDNER, Ph. D., FREDRIC A. GARDNER, BETHEL ARAM MINISTRIES and others
Defendant - Appellee: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, IRMA BOWIE, IRS agent, K. RAY, IRS agent and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?