Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Stephen Morris, et al v. Ernst & Young, LLP, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-16599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN MORRIS and KELLY MCDANIEL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNST & YOUNG, LLP and ERNST & YOUNG U.S., LLP
Morris Batts v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 10-56520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS BATTS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
George Huff, et al v. City of Los Angele
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-56344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE HUFF, LENDARD MORRIS, LORRAINE SORIANO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Morris Dreyfus v. Southern California IBEW-NECA, et al
as 09-56655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS DREYFUS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA PENSION TRUST FUND, DEAN TODD, Trustees and Named Fiduciaries, JAMES WILSON, Trustees and Named Fiduciaries and others
Kathleen Paulsen, et al v. Local No. 856 of International, et al
as 09-15718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHLEEN PAULSEN, LONNIE MORRIS, NEVA SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LOCAL NO. 856 OF INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS and JOE MARTINELLI
Alam, et al v. Construction Protect
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 06-56380
Plaintiff:
MARGARET A. HOFFMAN, an individual, for herself and on behalf of all others similarly situated and DANIEL LOPEZ
Appellant:
MIAN ALAM, GREAN RASHOD ANDERSON, PETER BAKER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSTRUCTION PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.