Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Retired Independent Guards Ass, et al v. Wackenhut Services, Inc., et al
as 11-17868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RETIRED INDEPENDENT GUARDS ASSOCIATION OF NEVADA, PERRY J. ARNETT, MICHAEL R. BAER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WACKENHUT SERVICES, INC., BOARD OF TRUSTEES, INDEPENDENT GUARDS ASSOCIATION OF NEVADA-WACKENHUT SERVICES INCORPORATED PENSION TRUST FUND, INDEPENDENT GUARDS ASSOCIATION OF NEVADA and others
Glenn Tibble, et al v. Edison International, et al
as 11-56628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN TIBBLE, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM BAUER, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM IZRAL, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
EDISON INTERNATIONAL, THE EDISON INTERNATIONAL BENEFITS COMMITTEE, FKA The Southern California Edison Benefits Committee, EDISON INTERNATIONAL TRUST INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
William Baudler v. American Baptist Homes of the
as 11-16754
Petitioner - Appellee:
WILLIAM A. BAUDLER, Regional Director of the Thirty-Second Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Relations Board
Respondent - Appellant:
AMERICAN BAPTIST HOMES OF THE WEST, DBA Piedmont Gardens
David Barboza v. California Association of Prof, et al
as 11-16082
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID BARBOZA
Defendant - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS, a California corporation, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS, LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATION INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California coporation and others
David Barboza v. California Association of Prof, et al
as 11-16081
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID BARBOZA
Defendant - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS, a California corporation, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS, LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATION INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California coporation and others
David Barboza v. CA Association of Prof. FF, et al
as 11-16024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BARBOZA
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS, a California corporation, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS, LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATION INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California coporation and others
David Barboza v. California Association of Prof, et al
as 11-15472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BARBOZA
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS, a California corporation, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS, LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATION INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California coporation and others
Trustees of the Alaska Laborer v. Raindance Healthcare Group, In, et al
as 10-35985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRUSTEES OF THE ALASKA LABORERS HEALTH AND SECURITY, RETIREMENT, TRAINING AND LEGAL SERVICES TRUST FUNDS
Defendant:
RAINDANCE HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW L. TURNER, individually and WILLIAM LASKY, individually
Morris Batts v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 10-56520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS BATTS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Glenn Tibble, et al v. Edison International, et al
as 10-56415
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GLENN TIBBLE, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM BAUER, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM IZRAL, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EDISON INTERNATIONAL, THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON BENEFITS COMMITTEE, incorrectly named The Edison International Benefits Committee, EDISON INTERNATIONAL TRUST INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
