Cases 1 - 10 of 73
S. Wellons, et al v. PNS Stores, Inc., et al
as 23-55665
Plaintiff / Appellee:
S. WELLONS, C. ARREDONDO, S. DAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PNS STORES, INC., a California corporation and BIG LOTS STORES, INC., an Ohio Corporation
Winston Anderson, et al v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al
as 22-16268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WINSTON R. ANDERSON and CHRISTOPHER M. SULYMA, and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, INTEL RETIREMENT PLANS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE INTEL CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Arnold Contreras, et al v. ASARCO LLC, et al
as 22-15406
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD CONTRERAS, TONY M. MEZA, CHARLES M. ESTRADA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ASARCO LLC and ASARCO RETIREE MEDICAL PLAN
Not Yet Classified:
MILLWRIGHTS AND MACHINE ERECTORS LOCAL 1607, successor in interest Local 1914 Millwright
Cross Defendant:
LOCAL 627 BOILERMAKERS, IRON SHIPBUILDERS, BLACKSMITH, FORGER AND HELPERS, LOCALS 518,570 AND 602 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 518 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS and others
Arnold Contreras, et al v. ASARCO LLC, et al
as 22-15388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARNOLD CONTRERAS, TONY M. MEZA, CHARLES M. ESTRADA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ASARCO LLC and ASARCO RETIREE MEDICAL PLAN
Not Yet Classified:
LOCAL 627 BOILERMAKERS, IRON SHIPBUILDERS, BLACKSMITH, FORGER AND HELPERS, LOCALS 518,570 AND 602 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 518 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS and others
I. M. v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
as 19-16374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IAN MOURA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and I. M., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC.
Gary Romanchuk v. Board of Trustees of the South, et al
as 17-56208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY M. ROMANCHUK
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND FOOD EMPLOYERS JOINT PENSION TRUST FUND, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND FOOD EMPLOYERS JOINT BENEFIT FUNDS ADMINISTRATION, LLC and APPEALS COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND FOOD EMPLOYERS JOINT PENSION TRUST
Gary Romanchuk v. SCUF & CWUF Joint Benefit Fund, et al
as 17-56069
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GARY M. ROMANCHUK
Defendant - Appellant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND FOOD EMPLOYERS JOINT PENSION TRUST FUND, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND FOOD EMPLOYERS JOINT BENEFIT FUNDS ADMINISTRATION, LLC and APPEALS COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND FOOD EMPLOYERS JOINT PENSION TRUST
Steve Harris, et al v. Amgen, Inc., et al
as 17-55680
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVE HARRIS, DENNIS F. RAMOS, AKA Dennis Ramos, JORGE TORRES and others
Objector - Appellant:
DONALD HANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC., AMGEN MANUFACTURING, LIMITED, FRANK J. BIONDI, Jr. and others
Christopher Sulyma v. Intel Corporation Investment P, et al
as 17-15864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. SULYMA, and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE INTEL CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS, INTEL RETIREMENT PLANS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE and others
Thomas Perez v. Sandpoint Gas N Go & Lube Cent, et al
as 17-35106
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant - Appellant:
SANDPOINT GAS N GO & LUBE CENTER, INC., an Idaho corporation and SYDNEY M. OSKOUI, individually and as President of Sandpoint Gas N Go & Lube Center, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
