Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 24,565
White v. Merit Systems Protection Board
as 24-2337
Petitioner: GLENN H. WHITE
Respondent: MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Turner v. Brown, et al.
as 24-2237
Plaintiff: ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant: EDMOND G. BROWN, JR., SCOTT KERNAN, MATTHEW CATES and others
Randolph v. Sandoval, et al.
as 24-2203
Plaintiff: COLIN M. RANDOLPH
Defendant: C. SANDOVAL, V. BENAVIDES, H. CARRILLO and others
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff: LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Raiser v. Gelmis, et al.
as 24-2163
Plaintiff: AARON RAISER
Defendant: SUSAN GELMIS, ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Kulick v. Olmstead, et al.
as 24-2129
Plaintiff: R. J. KULICK
Defendant: REED H. OLMSTEAD, LAW OFFICES OF REED H. OLMSTEAD and DOES, 1-100, inclusive
H., et al. v. Seattle Public Schools
as 24-1882
Plaintiff: J. H. and D. H., parents of P.H. a minor
Defendant: SEATTLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Egan v. Wei, et al.
as 24-1755
Plaintiff: MICHAEL EGAN
Defendant: MAGGIE M. WEI, individually, M.D. in her official capcity, TRAN B. LOCKE, individually, M.D. in her official capacity, ALVIN H. NGUYEN, individually, D.O. in his official capacity and others
Egan v. Wei, et al.
as 24-1714
Plaintiff: MICHAEL EGAN
Defendant: MAGGIE M. WEI, individually, M.D. in her official capcity, TRAN B. LOCKE, individually, M.D. in her official capacity, ALVIN H. NGUYEN, individually, D.O. in his official capacity and others
Long v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al.
as 24-1557
Plaintiff: RICHARD D. LONG
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, 3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?