Cases 11 - 20 of 986
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Jackson v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1771
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, in relation to The Nevada Department of Corrections, E K MCDANIEL, DWIGHT WALTER NEVEN and others
Jackson v. Quick, et al.
as 24-1740
Plaintiff:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant:
JASON QUICK, Watch Commander at Madera County Jail, ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, CSU Officer at Madera County Jail, LISETTE LOPEZ, Mailroom Officer at Madera County Jail and others
American Strategic Insurance Corp v. Jackson, et al.
as 24-1453
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN STRATEGIC INSURANCE CORP, a foreign insurer
Defendant:
JACOB JACKSON, STACY JACKSON, INSPIRIT ATHLETICS INC, a Washington For-Profit Corporation doing business as Sterling Athletics and others
Enciso v. Jackson National Life Insurance Company
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
CARMEN ENCISO, as an individual and Trustee of The Donald E. Regan and Carmen Enciso Family Trust UDTA dated September 24, 2002 and as successor in interest to the Estate of Donald E. Regan
Defendant:
JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Demos v. Bayer, et al.
as 24-828
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
DANIEL BAYER, Shift Lt, WSP, JENNIFER ADAMS, P.R.E.A. Liason, WSP, M. MORENO, Major Hearings Officer, WSP and others
Demos v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL STRANGE, ROBERT FERGUSON, BRAD BOWMAN and others
Sancho v. Jackson County, et al.
as 24-638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN ANTHONY SANCHO
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKSON COUNTY, DAVID L. DALTON, BRADY BJORKLAND and others
Hill v. Wise, et al.
as 24-605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT J HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD WISE, Unit Sgt., 2nd-shift, JON COERS, Classification Counselor 1, AARON KERSHAW, Unit Sgt., 3rd-shift and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
