Cases 11 - 20 of 562
Pop-Ba, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2475
Petitioner:
CONSUELO POP-BA and NELSON GABRIEL CAB-POP
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dada, et al. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al.
as 24-2179
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DADA, SERGIO ARAUZ, GABRIELA CACERES GUTIERREZ and others
Defendant:
NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Whalen, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 24-2086
Petitioner:
CHRISTINE WHALEN, KATHERINE ARCELL, JOSE BRITO and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Interested Party:
ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., CERBERUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP and THE KROGER CO.
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-1958
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FREYA BRIER, MOSHE ADMON, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. Garland
as 24-1681
Petitioner:
GABRIEL GONZALEZ-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Roman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-1580
Petitioner:
GABRIEL L. ROMAN
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Gigena v. Day, et al.
as 24-1212
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL GIGENA
Defendant:
RENEE C. DAY, TODD RIEBE, GREGORY G. GILLOTT and others
Gigena v. Sexton, et al.
as 24-1218
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL GIGENA
Defendant:
ANDREA SEXTON, PATRICK M. KEENE, ADAM ALLEN and others
Benshoof, et al. v. Brier, et al.
as 24-952
Plaintiff:
KURT BENSHOOF and BRIANA GAGE
Defendant:
FREYA BRIER, MOSHE ADMON, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
