Cases 11 - 20 of 480
Guzman-Guerrero, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1454
Petitioner:
TERESA GUZMAN-GUERRERO and ALONDRA ABARCA-GUZMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Camargo Rincon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1376
Petitioner:
CAMILO ANDRE CAMARGO RINCON, CLAUDIA MARCELA SANCHEZ-GUZMAN and ANDRES SANTIAGO CAMARGO-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pino-Guzman, et al. v. Garland
as 24-971
Petitioner:
CARLOS PINO-GUZMAN, ANA MARROQUIN-LOPEZ and CARLOS PINO-MARROQUIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Valladares-Maldonado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-972
Petitioner:
IVAN OSWALDO VALLADARES-MALDONADO, GRISELDA MENDEZ-PALACIOS, JOSE IVAN VALLADARES-MENDEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Guzman v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-587
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCO GUZMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE, CHARLES DANIELS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Respondent:
CALVIN JOHNSON and STATE OF NEVADA
Buritica, et al. v. Garland
as 24-295
Petitioner:
JORGE GUZMAN BURITICA, MARIA MARINA ABELLA MADERO and SERGIO ALEJANDRO GUZMAN ABELLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Diaz-Guzman v. Garland
as 23-4248
Petitioner:
JUAN PABLO DIAZ-GUZMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Morales-Guzman v. Garland
as 23-3576
Petitioner:
REMIGIO MORALES-GUZMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Guzman De Valladares, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3617
Petitioner:
SILVIA CAROLINA GUZMAN DE VALLADARES, MATEO ALEJANDRO VALLADARES-GUZMAN and KEVIN ALEXANDER VALLADARES-GUZMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Panoche Energy Center, LLC v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
as 23-1268
Petitioner:
PANOCHE ENERGY CENTER, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, MICHAEL S. REGAN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR OF REGION 9 OF U.S.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
