Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,854
Rhodes v. Ford
as 24-3106
Plaintiff: KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant: D. FORD, LTA, D. LUNSFORD, SSA, K. ROYAL and others
McLean v. Gutierrez, et al.
as 24-3086
Plaintiff: LENROY MCLEAN
Defendant: PHILLIP GUTIERREZ, Warden, in his individual and official capacity, FNU HERNANDEZ, Office Staff, in his/her individual capacity, FNU JENKINS, Unit Manager, in his/her individual and official capacity and others
United States of America v. Viana-Hernandez
as 24-3084
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JUAN VIANA-HERNANDEZ
Morales-Ocampo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3081
Petitioner: ESTEBAN MORALES-OCAMPO, GUADALUPE HERNANDEZ-FLORES, BRAYAN MORALES-HERNANDEZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Simeon Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-3032
Petitioner: MARIA J. SIMEON HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3007
Defendant: J. STEENBERGEN, Medical Personnel at USP Victorville, individual, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL MANK, Former Doctor at USP Victorville and others
Plaintiff: ALBERTO HERNANDEZ
Medrano Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-3022
Petitioner: JHUSTHYN KUEL MEDRANO HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Medrano Robayo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2993
Petitioner: JOHN HERMES MEDRANO ROBAYO, YUDY CAROLINA HERNANDEZ PARRA, DAN JEREMY MEDRANO HERNANDEZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-2966
Petitioner: DANIEL SOLOMAN MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Barren v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-2896
Plaintiff: DONALD ROBIN BARREN
Defendant: THE STATE OF NEVADA EX REL. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TOM LAWSON, P. JORDAN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?