Cases 11 - 20 of 1,037
Caraffa v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-1644
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA, named as Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named Judges of the Superior Court, ANN A. SCOTT TIMMER, Duty Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court and others
Correa v. Shaffer, et al.
as 24-1412
Plaintiff:
VICTOR CORREA
Defendant:
JENNIFER SHAFFER, Executive Director of Board of Prison Hearings, CHRISTINE NIJJER, Deputy Commissioner at B.P.H. Sacramento, JOE SULLIVAN, Deputy Commissioner and others
Houston v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-840
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant:
JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff, CAROLYN GOODMAN, MAYOR, MIRANDA M. DU, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Reed v. Eugene School District 4J, et al.
as 24-789
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL REED, as Next of Friend to M.R.
Defendant:
EUGENE SCHOOL DISTRICT 4J, PAULA MCCOWN, JONATHAN ANDREW DEY, JR. and others
Trader Joe's Company v. Trader Joes United
as 24-720
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRADER JOE'S COMPANY, a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
TRADER JOES UNITED
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Houston v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, Division of Forestry; Bureau of Land Management, DE LA GARZA, JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff and others
Houston v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-267
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff
Blackwell v. Jenkins, et al.
as 24-201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY KARL BLACKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
A. JENKINS
Defendant:
E. BARTKIEWIECZ, T. PRAKASH, IGOR DMYTRIENKO and others
Graham v. Highberger
as 24-65
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLIFFORD JOE GRAHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSHUA HIGHBERGER, Superintendent Oregon State Correctional Institution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
